Toellner Tells it

Kansas City makes owning chickens easier - and why this is good for the Urban Core

Earlier today, the Kansas City City Council changed the rules regarding back yard chickens. They changed the provision that didn't allow chickens within 100 feet of neighbors (which, frankly, made owning them in many neighborhoods impossible) to allowing them within 100 feet of neighbors, as long as the neighbors consented.

To protect some concerns, they put in provisions to allow for inspections, mandate proper disposal of manure, and (unfortunately) prohibits the onsite sale of eggs. (Last year, the city allowed for the on-premise sale of garden vegetibles. I have no idea why selling tomatoes at my house is ok, but eggs is not).

The move by the council is another step forward for urban agriculture in the city - and I applaud the city for taking positive steps forward in this regard. It is no secret that Kansas City's urban core has a lot of abandoned lots that can be put to good use -- and much of the urban core is in what the USDA has termed "Food Deserts" -- where there is limited access to fresh food.  Allowing for alterantive uses for these empty lots, as well as providing another urban food sources, is a solid way of solving both problems.

Meanwhile, some cities, such as Birmingham, are combining the urban gardening, the problem with food deserts, the abundance of empty lots, and children who have become increasingly far removed from their food supply, and started teaching urban gardening in schools -- with very good early success. 

KCUR's Jabulani Lefall on his morning radio program Central Standard has also been tackling this subject this week -- where yesterday he interviewed local youth that were also doing local, urban food production.

So here's to Kansas City's City Council, at least the majority of them, seeing the positive side of urban farming and again relaxing rules and making it easier for these small, urban farmers.  

 

KCMO issues downtown parking survey (& why the results likely won't highlight the solution)

Yesterday, the City of Kansas City issued an online survey to get people's opinions on parking downtown.

The questions are typical:

Do you live downtown?

Work downtown?

Is parking hard to find?

Do you have a dedicated parking space?

Do you look for on-street parking or park in a garage?

How far from your destination is too far away to park? 

Etc.

No matter how the survey comes back, I can't think of a single way that the city will recognize from the survey what one of the biggest problems with downtown parking is in this city.

First of all, I don't think there is a major problem with parking downtown for 90% of people, uses and destinations -- unless you're used to pulling up to a strip mall and parking right out front of your destination for free. But compared to most cities, Kansas City Parking is cake.  And cheap.

But if there is a problem, the problem isn't lack of parking spaces.

It's lack of access to those spaces.

Because of the city policy for the past 5 decades that has mandated a certain number of parking spots for downtown businesses, far too many parking spots have become single use lots. A business owns and maintains the lot, but those spaces can only be used by those businesses -- even if the business is not open.

Let's take the surface lot at 19th and McGee that encompasses the entire city block for an example. The lot is, I believe, owned by Children's Mercy Hospital.  They then drive shuttle buses from the lot to the hospital and back every day. At night, when the majority of their staff goes home, the entire city block of parking is chained off and not accessible. On a typical First Friday, there is a struggle for people to find parking spaces at the Crossroads -- and yet, this entire block of open parking spaces sits completely empty.

This same scenario plays out with various lots throughout downtown -- where a restaurant that relies almost solely on foot traffic during the day has empty spots, but then has a shortage of parking in the evening when people drive to their location -- and yet, the empty business lots around them are sitting empty. The Star has several lots exactly like this.

In many ways, Kansas City's parking space mandates have CREATED a parking shortage downtown. In other cities, it has become financially viable for a private person to own parking garages that cater to business workers during the day, but are easily accessible for events/restaurants/night life at night. They're mixed use garages.  We have very few of those in Kansas City (there is one on the 1700 block of Main between the old TWA building and the old Retro Inferno building - -so there are some) because of the city's parking laws. 

It's my hope that the city actualy takes a deep dive into the city's downtown parking situation -- and doesn't just look at a survey to conclude that "Parking is fine" or "We need more parking". 

The answer isn't that cut and dried. We need more mixed use parking spaces -- that have uses both in the day and then different uses in the evening. We don't necessarily need MORE parking -- just more and better access on more occassions.

KCMO School District needs to exercise nimbleness in reuse of schools

Earlier today, the Star ran an article discussing some options for a couple of the now-abandoned KCMO area schools. One of the options is a proposal by Academie Lafayette (a very successful French immersion charter school in the city, now with over 600 students) to take over Longan School at 3421 Cherry St.

According to the article, Academie Lafayette is seeking an answer on their proposal to take over the school this week because they need time to upgrade the facility (which has been abandoned now for more than a year) and accept increased enrollment -- or seek other options.

Now, make no mistake, this isn't a rushed decision by Academie Lafayette. Discussion about taking over Longan School has been going on for at least 3 months now.  Academie Lafette wants to take over the abandoned school.  The neighborhood is as close to unanimously in support of them taking over the abandoned school as could possibly ever happen.  And the KCMO school board is supposedly eager to not let their 30 newly abandoned schools got to good use and not sit and rot like other abandoned schools have.

So, what's the hold up?

While I respect that the school distric wants to make the best use of their school buildings, there seems to be little that could be a better fit for a school building, in a neighborhood, than a successful school.

Apparently other schools are also up for re-use proposals as Alta Vista has a proposal in for Douglass School (2640 Bellview) and Academy of Integrated Arts has a proposal in for Franklin School at 3400 Highland. 

If the school district is to repurpose these schools, they must use a respectable amount of nimbleness in doing so. They cannot make the red tape of using the schools be too big of a barrier to reusing these schools and not only preventing them from blighting neighborhoods, but actually making them USEFUL for the neighborhoods.

This is a can't lose. Make it happen. Because blocking progress is everything the school board said they wouldn't do when they shut down the schools a year ago.