Earlier today, a new study from Maddies Fund was released about how perceptions of dog handlers affected how people viewed an individual dog's behavior.
In the study, people were show pictures of 3 dogs and asked to rate them on a 6 point Likert scale their perceived friendliness, adoptability, approachability, intelligence, aggressiveness and difficulty to train.
People were also shown the same three dogs with different human handlers -- one with a rough looking adult male, one with a young boy and one with an elderly woman.
Not surprisingly, the results showed that people viewed the pit bull less favorably than they viewed the Labrador Retriever and the Border Collie -- giving it lower scores for friendliness, adoptability, approachability and intelligence -- and higher scores for aggressiveness and difficulty to train.
However, the scores for the pit bull jumped considerably when shown with the young boy and the elderly woman. From the study:
"The elderly woman and male child activated positive handler stereotypes, motivating participants to perceive the pit bull type dog as friendlier, more adoptable, more approachable and less aggressive while the rough male reinforced the dog's negative stereotype. These results suggest that a handler can serve as a primer for perceptions about a dog's characteristics."
Indeed.
The study results probably won't surprise most people much, but it does reinforce that overwhelmingly when people discuss ideas about restricting particular breeds of dogs, they are often talking about laws in place that target the types of people they PERCEIVE to be the typical owners of those types of dogs -- not necessarily the dogs themselves. This is why those that advocate for such laws are inclined to try to convince people that 'pit bulls' are the dog of choice for 'paraplegic drug dealers' and "gangbanger wannabe's." It's very much about racism and stereotyping owners, and not focusing on the dogs, and the reality that most commonly owned by respected members of society.
This is one reason that education at programs that focus on the REAL owners of pit bulls and showing the dogs as family members, are so effective in counter-acting this blatant, and incorrect, stereotyping.
While it should be about judging the dogs for what they are, I'm actually fine with people basing their predisposition off of the owners as well -- as long as they use the real owners and not the ones rooted in their fear-mongering imagination.
Here's the link to the info graphic posted below (you can click to enlarge):
Interesting, but not all that surprising to me. When my nephew walks our pit bull with us, I find more people want to actually pet her. I think it's hard to resist a 6 year old introducing a dog, 'And THIS is Lily" while putting his hand on her head. I don't think we've ever had someone not say "hi" to her after that. If it's just my husband, people will cross the street. When it's me, they'll walk passed us (but I always get her into a sit stay so maybe that's why?). I do think that the handler makes a difference. I admit when I'm jogging, there is a lab in the neighborhood that I avoid. Owner is hard looking and the dog is on a prong collar. His behavior has gotten increasingly more aggressive toward other dogs and people this last year (the owner yanks the prong collar repeatedly and most of the time there isn't a correction even needed so the dog is stressed out). The combination of the owner's looks and the dog's collar have me wary - so even as a pit bull owner, I'm guilty of perception judging as well.
Posted by: Jenn | November 13, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Interesting study and the results are not unexpected. Stereotyping clearly carries over to dogs unfortunately and some breeds have been singled out. Your point about the owners being singled out is a different take and I like the idea of focusing more of the resources on showing some of the more targeted breeds and who the actual owners are. There is a lot of misinformation here as you pointed out, so focusing on "information" campaigns as opposed to "misinformation" campaigns should be effective.
Posted by: Adrian Meli | November 13, 2012 at 08:51 PM
Its rough on city dwellers or those who don't reside in the country when it comes to the APBT and basic exercise. More people avoid us and send dirty looks my way than I care to count.
Posted by: Patch | November 13, 2012 at 09:17 PM
Thanks for the blog post about the research, Brent. It's super appreciated.
Posted by: Lisa Gunter | November 13, 2012 at 11:05 PM
Lisa -- it's very interesting research--- thanks for doing it.
Posted by: Brent | November 14, 2012 at 12:33 PM
I'm a middle-class white female with a black male pittie. Despite two strikes against him (pit bull and black), people usually respond positively to him, and a few have even said that "he must be a nice dog because you look like such a nice person."
Posted by: CW | November 26, 2012 at 01:15 PM
The only pit bull who ever bit one of my dogs (because the owner did not put him on a leash; both he and my dog were intact males, I'd leashed my dog) was owned by a white young woman who had blond hair with pink dyed streaks, leather clothing, nose piercing, and told me (when I'd asked, prior to her dog's attack) her dog's name was 'Viper'. I do not blame the dog, if he had been truly vicious, he would have done far more damage than a puncture wound to my dog's ear (cured by a phone call to my vet and the resulting application of Johnson & Johnson cream for a week). I occasionally see (now) a pit bull who hates my dog; he is kept under firm (leashed) control by his owner, an acquaintance of mine who got the young pit bull from a shelter; as far as I know, he is fine with people. Most other pit bulls I have met, owned by a variety of people, have been pleasant, good-natured dogs; though due to their energy level, a bit too much dog for me to consider owning.
Posted by: Pat F. | December 01, 2012 at 06:36 PM