This month, there was an interesting study by the ASPCA (written by Emily Weiss, Margaret Slater and Linda Ford) in their issue of Animals (HT to Seattle Dog Spot).
The study, performed between September-November 2010, includied 1,015 pet owning households -- 80% of whom owned dogs (817) and 50% (506) owned cats -- 30% (308) owned both a dog and a cat.
According to the reported research:
- 14% of dogs had been lost in the past 5 years, (of which, 95% were recovered) and 15% of cats were lost (of which, 75% were recovered).
-- 50% of dogs and 33% of cats had been lost multiple times
-- 80% of dogs and 88% of cats were spayed or neutered (male dogs were less likely to be altered than female dogs). This would seem to be counter to common thinking that unaltered animals are more likely to run off than altered ones.
-- Not surprisingly, people with higher incomes and more education were MORE likely to alter their pets than people with lower incomes and less education -- further highlighting the need for targeted low-cost spay/neuter services.
-- There was no significant difference in likelihood of a pet being lost based on income or education
-- 49% of found dogs were found by searching their neighborhood, 20% came home on their own, 15% were contacted because they were wearing a tag or had a microchip, 7% were brought home by a neighbor and 6% by contacting animal control
-- 59% of cats were found because they returned home on their own, 30% were found by searching the neighborhood. Only 2% were returned home because they were wearing a tag or mcircochipped, and another 2% via contacting animal control.
-- For people who never found their lost dogs, 75% of searched their neighborhood, 75% visited the shelter, 50% hung posters, 50% put an ad in their paper, 50% posted online and 38% called their veterinarian (I will note that the sample size is very low for this since most people found their pets).
-- For people who never found their cats, 67% searched the neighborhood, 22% visited a shelter, 17% hung posters , 11% put an ad in the paper, 6% posted online and 11% called veterinarians (again, a fairly low sample size). The number of lost cat owners that never visited the shelter to look for the cat (and a verys small percent have any form of identification) is likely a reason that most shelters have strikingly low return-to-owner rates for cats.
-- People who made less than $50,000 a year were less likely to be reunited with their dogs than people in higher income brackets. For cats, low income (less than $30,000 and high income ($100,000+) were more likely to be reunited, where people between $30,000-100,000 were less likely to find them.
-- Women were more likely than men to be reunited with their dogs, but the opposite was true for cats.
-- While the numbers of unfound pets seem fairly low by these numbers, when you compare to the large numbers of owned pets in this country (86 million cats, 78 million dogs), this still means that roughly 2.2 million dogs are lost each year, and 2.6 million cats. Based on this, a large number of the animals that find their way into shelters across the nation are actually owned animals, not strays. And based on numbers of animals that are never found, this accounts for 110,000 dogs and 645,000 cats annually that are owned, but unable to be reunited with their owners.
I think the results of the study are interesting on a lot of levels. They support a lot of reasons for targeted low cost spay/neuter programs and the need for aggressive programs to encourage pet owners to put identifying tags and microchips on their pets (particularly for indoor cats, who do get lost). It also poses a pretty hefty task on shelters to try to be creative to create programs to help reunited cats to cat owners (which includes encouraging cat owners to come to the shelter to look for their lost cats.
There may be some sample bias in this survey, but I thik it does provide some good first data on the frequency of pets becoming lost, and then found again.
Read the study in its entirety and I'd love to get your thoughts.
Having lost and been reunited with both my dog and cat, here are my thoughts, particularly related to the dog-cat discrepancy: 1. indoor-only cats are terrified and will hide. For a loong time. From everyone. Which means the normal strategies (flyers, shelters, etc.) aren't nearly as effective as they are with outdoor cats and WAY different from dogs. 2. I think a lot of cat owners assume that the cats won't end up at the shelters like dogs do, because they're not seen as a nuisance like loose dogs are. We're used to loose cats. When I meet a cat on the street, I assume it lives nearby. When I meet a dog, I try my darnedest to catch it and locate its owner. I admit that I never checked the shelter for my cat. 3. Cats' appearances are far less diverse than dogs. There sizes are more consistent, there are fewer common breeds, and there's only so much diversity in coloration/coat length. This makes them hard to identify by description, which means a LOT of false leads, which can be very, very discouraging.
Just a few initial thoughts. I'll be interested in digging into this. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Central Ohio Dog Blog | July 18, 2012 at 04:39 PM
CODB,
Agree on all your points and that cats and dogs are very different. When a handyman of ours accidentally let one of our cats out a few years ago I confess that looked for her, and asked a few neighbors to keep an eye out for her, but we knew she wouldn't go far. It was cold and I was 90% sure she'd come to where our heater exhaust comes out because it would be warm and protected there and we found her there three days later. But yes, agree that cats/dogs are much different
Posted by: Brent | July 18, 2012 at 05:57 PM
We have 3 indoor kitties. All were previously outdoor kitties. The newest addition BOLTS for the door any time we open it to let dogs in/out, visitors coming/going, tries to escape out the door to the garage hoping the garage door is open, etc. I'm sure the neighbors have laughed a few times as my husband and I were seen "herding" the cat back towards the house. She's a wily one. We call her our third dog because she begs at the dinner table right along with the two dogs and prefers their company to the company of the other two cats.
We are so frightened that she'll escape sometime, esp. at night and we won't even know. We are very careful but we've learned accidents do happen.
As hard as we all try to keep our animals safe, it's good to think about "what if" in the event something should happen.
Posted by: Jen Brighton | July 19, 2012 at 04:31 PM
Jen,
Definitely agree on the "what if" thing. I also think it's interesting how quick many rescues are to deny someone from adopting who has previously lost a pet, and then hear how people who are great advocates like you, me and Central Ohio have all had pets lost for a certain amount of time. It happens, and we shouldn't be so quick to judge those it's happened to.
Posted by: Brent | July 19, 2012 at 04:39 PM
And that puts some responsibility on animal control and other "shelters" to keep the animals long enough for the owners to find them AND to allow owners to see all of the animals. Too many kill on intake (or shortly after) or have secret areas where the public is not allowed.
Posted by: db | July 19, 2012 at 04:47 PM
db - Agreed on many fronts. In Missouri (and many states) there is a law about how long shelters must keep strays (in Missouri it's 5 days) so shelters can't kill them immediately (owner surrenders are a different matter). I would like to know what the average timeframe is between when an animal gets to the shelter and is matched with their owner. I'm going to see if we can track that at our shelter. It would be nice to know if x% get out within 3 days vs x% that need 5 or 6. At our shelter, our capacity is about 8-10 days worth of intake, so every day is critical...
Posted by: Brent | July 19, 2012 at 04:53 PM
The statement that owners with higher incomes have a greater chance of finding their dog correlates with our findings at Lost Dogs of Wisconsin. Reclaim fees are ridiculously high, often higher than adoption fees. Plus, an extended search costs money - printing, gas, time off work, etc. Dogs may often end up far outside the local shelter jurisdiction and owners may not have the time or gas money to check surrounding shelters. Shelters could help by posting stray pictures online, but many still don't - blaming the "irresponsible owner" for losing their dog.
Posted by: Kathy Pobloskie | July 20, 2012 at 06:26 PM
I would consider lost animals strays
Posted by: Tom | July 21, 2012 at 07:17 PM
Kathy, not trying to get dogs back home makes no sense at all -- much easier to get them back home than find new homes for all of them.
Tom, I think that mindset is very unsettling -- as most dogs DO have owners, many of whom are very concerned about them. Strays don't.
Posted by: Brent | July 23, 2012 at 10:24 AM
Missing Pet Partnership is the best source for information on locating lost pets.
We use and sell Boomerang Collar Tags, which are the highest quality tags I have found.
Also, many shelters use 24PetWatch microchips because they are paid a few dollars to use them. However, 24PetWatch charges a fee to update owner contact information after the first year, which is probably a reason many people do not update their information.
Posted by: Erich | July 25, 2012 at 12:29 PM