My Photo

Categories

follow us in feedly

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Best Of KC Dog Blog

Become a Fan

« Management of information | Main | Ontario 5 year ban-iversary gathering »

July 18, 2010

Comments

EmilyS

"Pit bulls are still not allowed in the city, but dogs with actual bite histories are now welcome." WTF????

Brent

I know, right? I don't even necessarily disagree with the 2nd chance given to biting dogs -- as most bites shouldn't necessarily lead to immediate euthanasia. But it is laughable that dogs with bite histories are allowed to live in town, but pit bulls without bite histories are not.

Amber

Ugh! Unfortunately, in the news today here in Colorado Springs is a story about a yorkie that was killed by a roaming "pit bull." A week ago, this probably wouldn't have even made the news but it feels like the media frenzy has just started. Of course, there's an outcry in the comments that "pit bulls" should be banned.

However, in 2009, the County Commission slashed the Humane Society's budget drastically and therefore, they don't have the manpower or resources to address issues in the community until they become big problems. (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20081213/ai_n31207947/) Why don't people "get" it? Why would they rather believe that it's better to ban a certain breed than provide enough money to enforce the laws already on the books?

Amber

Also in Colorado Springs around the same time, a woman's pit bull chased away an intruder who came into her house while she was sleeping. But do the headlines read, "Woman's pit bull chases away intruder!"? Nope.

http://www.krdo.com/news/24323005/detail.html

The comments to this entry are closed.