It's a big week this week, with a lot going on.
In Toronto, the folks at Banned Aid are having their appeal of the Ontario Breed Ban heard on Monday and Tuesday. The judge has already ruled that the term "pit bull" is arbitrary because it fails to refer to a specific breed of dog. The provincial act could be struck down entirely if the judge rules the act to be overly vague. Caveat will be there in person so I would expect that she'll have good stuff this week. She also has all the specifics on the when and where.
Completely coincidentally, I'm scheduled to be in Toronto this week, so I may try to sit in on one of the sessions.
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, in Omaha, they'll be having a hearing on Tuesday for their dangerous dog ordinance. Best of luck to everyone in Omaha. I do predict that this one will get ugly before its all said and done. Any time you have experts with one opinion, politicians with an opinion, and victims with a completely different opinion it is never the best recipe for good legislation. Good legislation is not emotional...and there is no way this one won't be an emotional trainwreck.
Meanwhile, in Sioux city, IA, they'll be hearing their revised dangerous dog ordinance on Monday. This ordinance has undergone a series of iterations. One city councilman, Aaron Rochester, wanted to pass an ordinance banning 'pit bulls' with a grandfather clause. Jim Rixner has a separate ordinance that does not allow for grandfathering. In spite of a lot of opposition to both ordinances, including opposition from expert organizations like the ASPCA and AKC, it sounds like at this point they are expecting the ordinance to pass. AGain, emotional decisions are never the best for public policy.
I'll be providing updates as the week goes on.
Sadly, Sioux City passed tonight.
Posted by: Jeni | September 15, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Another city that won't get any of my tourism dollars.
Posted by: MichelleD | September 15, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Came across this article when searching Canadian Papers for News on their Court case.
"Legal dogfight unleashed over pit bull ban"
The whole article is available online.(At least for now.)
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=68b0851f-f035-44f3-9acf-f77618902b41
Posted by: Would contribute to this Lawsuit | September 16, 2008 at 06:35 PM
News from Toronto Ontario,Canada
"Court reserves decision on appeal of pit bull ban"
http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/500413
Posted by: Would contribute to this Lawsuit | September 16, 2008 at 08:05 PM
The Omaha council meeting today, by all news accounts, seemed to have opinions by both sides. Of course one of the most outspoken in support of a full ban was Council Bluffs Assistant District Attorny...quote from WOWT.com article "Every dog was bred for a specific purpose,” said Council Bluffs City Assistant Attorney Don Bauermeister. Council Bluffs already has a pit bull ban in place. “That purpose for a pit bull is a felony in all 50 states, that was the purpose of the pit bull, that's what they do," said Bauermeister. "You cannot trust a pit bull not to fight."
Posted by: Chris | September 16, 2008 at 09:22 PM
"You cannot trust a pit bull not to fight." -- brought to you by almost every pit bull site out there.
Posted by: MichelleD | September 16, 2008 at 09:56 PM
Saw this on AFF and maybe this is what should be posted on every pit bull site out there
[quote]Individual dogs of all breeds, as they mature, may exhibit aggression towards other dogs. Adult dog behavior is a combination of nature and nurture and is influenced by the dog’s genetics, socialization, training and management.[/quote]
because I do think a lot of people don`t get it.
That`s why pets are getting hurt.
I NEVER assume that my dog will love EVERY dog.
(But my dog won`t be in the Headlines around the World if he injures/kills a dog/cat that he encounters.)
I see each dog as an individual and I don`t assume that because my dog has loved the last 999 that he will love #1000 and I also don`t believe people that tell me their dog loves EVERY dog because mine could be the one that their dog doesn`t love.
Slow and proper intros is my mantra.
That message does have to be hammered home to Pit people because of the damage done to ALL these great dogs when 1 makes the headlines.
Not fair but...
Posted by: Maybe this should be the message | September 19, 2008 at 10:49 AM
MTSBTM,
I completely agree with you. Ironically I think in many ways the "pit bull" rescue community has fostered many of the perceptions that older 'pit bulls' are likely to become more aggressive. The reality seems to be that a) not all bullies have this trait and b) a good number of adult dogs share a dislike for other dogs later in life -- particularly rude dogs.
Heck, if I were to point out the 3 or 4 most dog-agro dogs in my neighborhood, none of them would be bullies -- a couple of bad-tempered mutts, some Akita/Chow/something looking mix, a couple of OOC Corgis, a Wheaton Terrier. Yes, all dogs are individuals...I don't quite understand why that concept is so difficult for everyone to get...
Posted by: Brent | September 19, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Does anyone have the contacts/emails for these Omaha folks so I can write them?
Posted by: Lynn | January 15, 2009 at 09:09 AM