My Photo

Categories

follow us in feedly

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Best Of KC Dog Blog

Become a Fan

« Weekly Roundup - Week Ending 1/16/11 | Main | UK Dangerous Dogs Act Repeal Advances to Committee »

January 17, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451f90869e20148c7b4bc47970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Los Angeles MSN -- year 3 -- when can we expect it to start working?:

Comments

YesBiscuit!

In answer to your question, please put me down for "NEXT year it going to be the one!"

In fact feel free to recycle that as my answer every year in future.

MichelleD

My two quotes for Edith's spay (40lb) where $240 and $320.

kristina

my state offers low cost s/n, i payed 200 for all five of my cats, not a bad price if you ask me!

PAMM

"my state" - meaning everyone else's tax dollars had to subsidize your cats surgeries.

d.booth

Perhaps if you cant afford to spay neuter then you cant afford the vet bills to keep your pet flea, tick, heartworm free as well as regular vet visits. Perhaps you shouldnt get a pet. Last year I paid for 82 cats to get spayed/neutered - I dont even own a cat. I also spay/neuter my neighbors dogs as well as the six that someone dropped off at my house. Why? Im tired of seeing all the sick cats and discarded pups.

EA

My male cat here in Baltimore was only $19 including exam and overnight stay to get neutered. There are plenty of low cost options but they just take some research... same hospital female dogs start at $65 and males $55. This is a private vet who wants dogs S/N that is less then most "low-cost" options.... but most sadly won't do the legwork.

Brent

EA -- that is great that there is a vet who is stepping up there. Most cities do have vets and clinics that offer this service. The key is for the animal welfare community to do the legwork to let people know that these services are available. Also, being sure there is the capacity to handle the demand is important.

Brent

d. booth,

It seems like a common thing for people to claim that if people can't afford spay/neuter then they can't afford pets.

But that attitude leads to dead animals.

Let's face it, most shelters already have a ton of animals in them...so denying animals homes, or pulling them out of homes, is going to make that problem worse, not better. If people are taking care of the animals, then that is much better than what will happen in the majority of the shelters in this country.

And then there's the reality that we, the animal welfare community, want them to spay/neuter not for the health of the animal, or for the good of the owner, but for OUR benefit.

So why then shouldn't we subsidize this if it is to help us?

It seems like many want to decide that poor people shouldn't own pets....but this self-righteousness only leads to dead animals.

kmk

Well, this mandatory speutering might not work right away, and some dogs and cats are going to die, but it will be for the "Greater Good" and in a couple of years it's going to work - the shelter will be empty, and everyone is REALLY going to like it!

Oh...it's been three years?

Still not working?

The kill numbers are STILL going up?

Oopsie.

Dang it, WHEN are we going to see good results from the criminalization of non-criminal behavior? Oh, what the heck if it doesn't work - the control factor is just too much fun! It's way fun to take pets from defenseless poor people with no resources and no attorney on speed-dial. It gives Animal Control such a sense of power.

I am all in favor of non-profits helping pet owners with speutering and basic vet care - and the government needs to butt out. Maybe that will give them more time to fix the streets and worry about crime.

I speuter my pets for MY benefit. If the pets benefit from it, that's a nice side effect, but I do it for my convenience. But if the government starts telling me I have to do speuter my pet, every last one of them will be left intact in the future.

PAMM - People Against Murdering Mutts

Pets are dying in the shelters because of self-righteous jerks like d booth. Exactly WHAT problem do you solve by saying "people that can't afford s/n shouldn't have pets"? Do you want poor people to just kill their pets so they don't have them anymore? Do you think those animals DESERVE to die because they're not altered? That's what you're saying...and people like you, that would rather see an animal dead, and yet claim to care about animals, makes me sick.

Cathie Turner

I think what is interesting is how much the Los Angeles vets increased their S/N charges after the law was passed - something even Los Angeles Animal Services decries.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment